Dear ChatGPT,
- any really scientific conception is a set of basic principles and provisions, which rigorously scientifically follow from rigorously scientifically enough grounded primary assumptions, and which has real essential enough implications for some sciences.
All that above really practically by no means relates to what is in your response in the pointed in the response papers, where the authors write that they think that information as a fundamental principle of the universe, mostly writing that the base of universe are “bits”; so, say, “universe is a computer” – however at that write nothing – for what reason, and by what way that is in universe?
Really the hypothesis that the ultimate base of universe [more correctly of Matter] are bits has quite rational scientific base – the C. F. von Weizsäcker first 1950s really outstanding “Ur hypothesis”, where the author shows that spinor representation [which is used at description in physics of fermions binary spin states] of vectors in 3-dimdsionnal space completely equivalent to the ordinary representations of vectors, and so if particles, etc., Matter exist and interacts that can be as some binary operations. The hypothesis on one hand so is well scientifically grounded, from another hand that solves one of fundamental problems in physics “why Matter’s space is 3D?”.
To underlined the fundamentality of the correspondin bits von Weizsäcker named them “Urs” – the fundamental binary alternatives [so, of course, “bits”] that are base of World in German mythology, the transcendent assumption “everything is from bit” is well more than a thousand of years old,
- however the Ur-hypothesis isn’t mentioned in the your response papers, and by you, so, again, that is in the papers really is/are only eventually some essentially bare declarations.
Your response has only one – and indeed fundamental - point – E. Fredkin “digital philosophy”, where he, and essentially Toffoli, shown that in systems of binary reversible elements energy at interactions of the elements doesn’t dissipate from the system; and so, provided that Matter’s base is a binary reversible logics, that clarifies the also fundamental physical problem “why in Matter/physics the fundamental energy conservation law acts?”
Nonetheless both these [von Weizsäcker and Fredkin] really outstanding findings really didn’t resulted in some essential implications for physics – physics well more 300 years works in 3D space, and in physics the energy conservation law acts; since the main ground of the finding remain be not convincing enough till now.
All the rest in your response, again, is/are rather bare declarations, and so completely naturally from this really no any really scientific implication for any science follows; including, say, if in physics, where time is the time dimension and time variable, the implication that “Time has End” would be used, that would be rather strange physics. As well as, say, if for physics the rather strange “Morphic Resonance” [ the paper’s truncated by you whole tittle is “Presence of the Past: Morphic Resonance and the Habits of Nature”] would have corresponding implications, that would be also rather strange.
So really your response looks as rather strange, and looks as even more strange, since if somebody paste the wording “The Information as Absolute” conception” into Google search line, Google shows a lot of corresponding links, but you don’t mention any of them. So if you haven’t access to Google search, I point here a corresponding link
⚠ Тільки зареєстровані користувачі бачать весь контент та не бачать рекламу.
[Abstract see below]
- where the authors state that this [philosophical] conception is completely rigorously scientifically grounded, and has a number of really fundamental implications for whole, including QM, physics, in “consciousness problem”, etc., see the references in the paper.
Would you be kind to response in this case to the thread question?
Abstract This article presents and grounds (i.e. presents proof of the existence, the truth, the self-consistence and the completeness of) the informational concept (“the Information as Absolute” concept) in philosophy and sciences, which was developing from 2007 year till now. The concept defines the Information as ultimately common, real and fundamental “absolute” phenomenon, which exists as absolutely infinite set (“Information” Set) of elements (members) and informational (e.g., logical) links between the elements; where any element itself is some informational structure also. Correspondingly, for example, Matter as the substance, radiation, etc., is some system of informational patterns, constituting a specific, and practically infinitesimal comparing to the Set, element “Matter” of the “Information” Set. The concept allows for the resolution, or at least for a consideration on a higher level of rational comprehension, of basic ontological and epistemological problems in philosophy and natural sciences; it clarifies basic fundamental notions such as space, time, energy, etc., and so is the fundamental base for real development of science
Cheers
