Dear Evgeny,
- relating to your “I have a question: do you happen to have a Russian version of your paper
Preprint
[ PDF above F4_BasicPhys ] or any other works of a similar nature?...”
- I have no time enough to make Russian versions, while now Google translator works rather adequately – but not always, though; and so now can only point that:
In my post above 3 main papers are pointed – the really [i.e. not mainstream philosophical] philosophical “The Information as Absolute” conception, where, first of all, it is rigorously proven that there exist nothing else than some informational patterns/systems of the patterns [IPSs] that are elements of the absolutely fundamental and absolutely infinite “Information” Set. The Set exists absolutely objectively, because of it fundamentally – logically - cannot be non-existent, and so exists absolutely eternally, having no Beginning and no End;
- while the utmost general scientifically rigorous definition of the so absolutely fundamental phenomenon/notion “Information” is:
“Information is something that is constructed in accordance with the set/system of absolutely fundamental Rules, Possibilities, Quantities, etc. – the set/system “Logos” in the conception”
Correspondingly in the conception, besides the absolutely basic “Information” a number of other, fundamentally transcendent in mainstream philosophy and sciences, including physics, fundamental phenomena/notions, are rigorously scientifically defined; first of all:
“Consciousness” and “Matter” - are informational systems/ the Set’s elements.
“Space”, “Time”, “Energy”, “Logical Rules”, etc., are “Logos” set elements, which, including, so aren’t some IPSs; from what essentially follows that, say, actualizations of “Space” and “Time” in “Matter” as the Matter’s space and time is the absolute Matter’s spacetime, which fundamentally cannot be “contracted/dilated/curved, etc,
Second main point – the conception completely legitimates the couple of really utmost fundamental in XX century von Weizsäcker and Fredkin-Toffoli findings in physics – that Matter is a logical structure that is based on binary logics [von Weizsäcker’s “Ur hypothesis”] and that the binary operations in Matter are reversible [Fredkin’s “Digital philosophy/physics”], which outside the conceptions have no any rational grounds – for/by what, if non-mystic, reason/way these logical structures exists in Matter. Though that relates to all mainstream physics – any/every postulate of any theory has fundamentally no scientific answer to for/by what, if non-mystic, reason/way this postulate exists at all.
That’s practically all in why the title “Planck scale informational physical model” contains word “informational”; and, of course, the model contains no any relations to popular in mainstream physics “Shannon theory of information” that really relates to “Information” as a too specific “theory of communications”, which practically only in quite specific [and till now really inessential; “informational entropy”, “holographic principle”, etc., are rather strange mental constructions] cases has some relation to real physics.
So in the PSIP model only really rigorously adequate to the reality physical traits/parameters [linear and angular momentums, energy, action, now 3 fundamental Nature Gravity, Electric, Nuclear/Strong forces], and corresponding laws/links/constants] of matter are used and their applications in concrete basic cases are considered; and, at that, the model is in full accordance with all really reliable experimental data.
That’s all, the model doesn’t contain some arbitrary really scientifically non-grounded exotic assumptions – no “virtual” particles and interactions, “supersymmetries”, etc.; and to understand it it is enough to have basic physical education – and to be able to think really scientifically, i.e. logically, rationally, objectively, and critically.
Cheers
Четверг 27.11 2025, 15-30
- relating to your “I have a question: do you happen to have a Russian version of your paper
Preprint
⚠ Тільки зареєстровані користувачі бачать весь контент та не бачать рекламу.
- I have no time enough to make Russian versions, while now Google translator works rather adequately – but not always, though; and so now can only point that:
In my post above 3 main papers are pointed – the really [i.e. not mainstream philosophical] philosophical “The Information as Absolute” conception, where, first of all, it is rigorously proven that there exist nothing else than some informational patterns/systems of the patterns [IPSs] that are elements of the absolutely fundamental and absolutely infinite “Information” Set. The Set exists absolutely objectively, because of it fundamentally – logically - cannot be non-existent, and so exists absolutely eternally, having no Beginning and no End;
- while the utmost general scientifically rigorous definition of the so absolutely fundamental phenomenon/notion “Information” is:
“Information is something that is constructed in accordance with the set/system of absolutely fundamental Rules, Possibilities, Quantities, etc. – the set/system “Logos” in the conception”
Correspondingly in the conception, besides the absolutely basic “Information” a number of other, fundamentally transcendent in mainstream philosophy and sciences, including physics, fundamental phenomena/notions, are rigorously scientifically defined; first of all:
“Consciousness” and “Matter” - are informational systems/ the Set’s elements.
“Space”, “Time”, “Energy”, “Logical Rules”, etc., are “Logos” set elements, which, including, so aren’t some IPSs; from what essentially follows that, say, actualizations of “Space” and “Time” in “Matter” as the Matter’s space and time is the absolute Matter’s spacetime, which fundamentally cannot be “contracted/dilated/curved, etc,
Second main point – the conception completely legitimates the couple of really utmost fundamental in XX century von Weizsäcker and Fredkin-Toffoli findings in physics – that Matter is a logical structure that is based on binary logics [von Weizsäcker’s “Ur hypothesis”] and that the binary operations in Matter are reversible [Fredkin’s “Digital philosophy/physics”], which outside the conceptions have no any rational grounds – for/by what, if non-mystic, reason/way these logical structures exists in Matter. Though that relates to all mainstream physics – any/every postulate of any theory has fundamentally no scientific answer to for/by what, if non-mystic, reason/way this postulate exists at all.
That’s practically all in why the title “Planck scale informational physical model” contains word “informational”; and, of course, the model contains no any relations to popular in mainstream physics “Shannon theory of information” that really relates to “Information” as a too specific “theory of communications”, which practically only in quite specific [and till now really inessential; “informational entropy”, “holographic principle”, etc., are rather strange mental constructions] cases has some relation to real physics.
So in the PSIP model only really rigorously adequate to the reality physical traits/parameters [linear and angular momentums, energy, action, now 3 fundamental Nature Gravity, Electric, Nuclear/Strong forces], and corresponding laws/links/constants] of matter are used and their applications in concrete basic cases are considered; and, at that, the model is in full accordance with all really reliable experimental data.
That’s all, the model doesn’t contain some arbitrary really scientifically non-grounded exotic assumptions – no “virtual” particles and interactions, “supersymmetries”, etc.; and to understand it it is enough to have basic physical education – and to be able to think really scientifically, i.e. logically, rationally, objectively, and critically.
Cheers
⚠ Тільки зареєстровані користувачі бачать весь контент та не бачать рекламу.
⚠ Тільки зареєстровані користувачі бачать весь контент та не бачать рекламу.
