Гость344998
Г
блин чё за вброссы! любой человек может на 100 $/мес. роскошно жить, всё остальное дешевые понты и пускание пыли в глаза...
ЗП в США официальная статистика
- Автор теми sherman
- Дата створення
Статус: Офлайн
Реєстрація: 04.09.2011
Повідом.: 169
Реєстрація: 04.09.2011
Повідом.: 169
Вот еще интересная ссылочка (не моя! я не виноват! 
мне ее подкинул мой американский друг):
Статья о некоторых заковыках американского законодательства и том как этим пользуются предприимчивые полицейские департаменты.
В частности там написано:
"In general, you needn’t be found guilty to have your assets claimed by law enforcement; in some states, suspicion on a par with “probable cause” is sufficient. Nor must you be charged with a crime, or even be accused of one. Unlike criminal forfeiture, which requires that a person be convicted of an offense before his or her property is confiscated, civil forfeiture amounts to a lawsuit filed directly against a possession, regardless of its owner’s guilt or innocence.
One result is the rise of improbable case names such as United States v. One Pearl Necklace and United States v. Approximately 64,695 Pounds of Shark Fins. (Jennifer Boatright and Ron Henderson’s forfeiture was slugged State of Texas v. $6,037.) “The protections our Constitution usually affords are out the window,” Louis Rulli, a clinical law professor at the University of Pennsylvania and a leading forfeiture expert, observes. A piece of property does not share the rights of a person. There’s no right to an attorney and, in most states, no presumption of innocence. Owners who wish to contest often find that the cost of hiring a lawyer far exceeds the value of their seized goods. Washington, D.C., charges up to twenty-five hundred dollars simply for the right to challenge a police seizure in court, which can take months or even years to resolve."
мне ее подкинул мой американский друг):⚠ Тільки зареєстровані користувачі бачать весь контент та не бачать рекламу.
Статья о некоторых заковыках американского законодательства и том как этим пользуются предприимчивые полицейские департаменты.
В частности там написано:
"In general, you needn’t be found guilty to have your assets claimed by law enforcement; in some states, suspicion on a par with “probable cause” is sufficient. Nor must you be charged with a crime, or even be accused of one. Unlike criminal forfeiture, which requires that a person be convicted of an offense before his or her property is confiscated, civil forfeiture amounts to a lawsuit filed directly against a possession, regardless of its owner’s guilt or innocence.
One result is the rise of improbable case names such as United States v. One Pearl Necklace and United States v. Approximately 64,695 Pounds of Shark Fins. (Jennifer Boatright and Ron Henderson’s forfeiture was slugged State of Texas v. $6,037.) “The protections our Constitution usually affords are out the window,” Louis Rulli, a clinical law professor at the University of Pennsylvania and a leading forfeiture expert, observes. A piece of property does not share the rights of a person. There’s no right to an attorney and, in most states, no presumption of innocence. Owners who wish to contest often find that the cost of hiring a lawyer far exceeds the value of their seized goods. Washington, D.C., charges up to twenty-five hundred dollars simply for the right to challenge a police seizure in court, which can take months or even years to resolve."
Статус: Офлайн
Реєстрація: 13.03.2007
Повідом.: 6471
Реєстрація: 13.03.2007
Повідом.: 6471
За основную массу мексиканцев переживать не стоит) так как детей настругают, на пособие сядут, за квартиру за них платят, страховка от государства, они еще за кеш работают и хорошо себя чувствтуют)